Fact: Reporters investigate potential stories. They go to solid sources of information to get answers so that they don't spout opinions as fact.
Fact: JLC is first and foremost a reporter, working the Redskins beat. He reports on the Redskins: good, bad and ugly.
Fact: Cerrato made public statements regarding an employed NFL coach and another potential job.
This thing was such a non-story, until Cerrato riled up the troops with a completely false and inflammatory statement:
But when a guy is trying to hurt the franchise of the Washington redskins, I’m gonna stand up and I’m gonna defend the Washington Redskins, because there is nothing that happened on that—this is just a guy attacking us, and I wish that he would just be professional like the rest of his colleagues that cover the Redskins. Period.
The Washington Post and the NFL both confirm that there were no allegations of tampering. So why would Cerrato say that? I would argue that attacking a member of the media for doing his job and falsely representing what said media member was doing is pretty unprofessional.
The question I would like answered is why did the League office tell Cerrato about this if (A) there was no accusation, and (B) even if there was, it wouldn't mean anything because a tampering charge has to come from a team?
I don't get my John McCain news from Sarah Palin for the same reason that I don't get my Barack Obama news from Joe Biden. So stop taking Vinny Cerrato's word at face value. This is just another PR arm of Snyder Enterprises, and JLC and the Washington Post have long been in their doghouse.









